The color is nice, but when I click on a link, it is not aligned properly: instead the first part is hidden. Here is what happens when I click on participle.

you were asked in the meeting to make the text a little more compact, by e.g. reducing spacing between the formal properties or in the lists of examples. Can you please look into that.

I will make the above corrections. Thanks for your reviews.

I thought about this more overnight (it is easier to think with the mock-up, thank you).

• I think the header should be shorter to save screen space
  • can we have "Global wordnet association * Open WordNet Documentation * search" all on the same line
• the colours you have selected are from Princeton's site, and are Princeton Universities colors. I think that might be misleading.
• Let's try and go with blue and grey, like Rohitesh is doing for the OMW
• https://github.com/orgs/globalwordnet/teams/documentation/discussions/11

For the compression, we could also do it by shifting things around. For example we could go
name 'symbol' (id) ⮀ reverse
short def: short example

e.g.:
Hyponym '⊂' (hyponym ⮀ hypernym)
"a word that is more specific than a given word" --- dog is a hyponym of animal
applicability synset–synset

Domain Topic (domain_topic ⮀ has_domain_topic)
"A concept which is the scientific category pointer of a given concept." --- computer science is a domain topic of CPU
applicability synset–synset; sense–synset; sense–sense

If you can do something clever so that if the screen is too narrow the example starts on a new line, that would be even nicer:

Domain Topic (domain_topic ⮀ has_domain_topic)
"A concept which is the scientific category pointer of a given concept."
--- computer science is a domain topic of CPU
applicability synset–synset; sense–synset; sense–sense

I think it will be better I go with the color combination from my second mockup. I am not too cool with the color combination from Robitech. Please take a look at the second mockup color again. Mainwhile what is the main color for Global WordNet Association?

For the compression, we could also do it by shifting things around. For example we could go
name 'symbol' (id) ⮀ reverse
short def: short example

e.g.:
Hyponym '⊂' (hyponym ⮀ hypernym)
"a word that is more specific than a given word" --- dog is a hyponym of animal
applicability synset–synset

Domain Topic (domain_topic ⮀ has_domain_topic)
"A concept which is the scientific category pointer of a given concept." --- computer science is a domain topic of CPU
applicability synset–synset; sense–synset; sense–sense

If you can do something clever so that if the screen is too narrow the example starts on a new line, that would be even nicer:

Domain Topic (domain_topic ⮀ has_domain_topic)
"A concept which is the scientific category pointer of a given concept."
--- computer science is a domain topic of CPU
applicability synset–synset; sense–synset; sense–sense

I have made the changes. Using this format.

Hi,

this is an improvement, but it would be better if:

• the title page stayed at the top
• there was a separator between relations in the main page
• the navbar is much tighter -- maybe lose the lines?
  • on a small screen you can't see the end
• you were going to hide the toc by default (and have it toggleable)

Hi,

this is an improvement, but it would be better if:

• the title page stayed at the top

• there was a separator between relations in the main page

• the navbar is much tighter -- maybe lose the lines?

  • on a small screen you can't see the end

• you were going to hide the toc by default (and have it toggleable)

I am not quite sure what you meant by the title page staying at the top and adding lose lines to the navbar

Hi,

this is an improvement, but it would be better if:

• the title page stayed at the top

• there was a separator between relations in the main page

• the navbar is much tighter -- maybe lose the lines?

  • on a small screen you can't see the end

• you were going to hide the toc by default (and have it toggleable)

I have made the changes.